ProviderQMS

Workforce & payroll

Juste vs Sentrient GRC for NDIS

Compare the published scope, cost evidence and buying questions before you commit.

Sources checked 2026-09-24 · Source-based comparison

Vendor-source research, not hands-on tests or a ranked endorsement. ProviderQMS sells document kits and a separate QMS product. No vendor enquiry collection or affiliate source links. How we compare.

The decision to make

Juste and Sentrient GRC for NDIS both appear in our workforce & payroll research. Connect availability, skills, shifts, approved time and the payroll handoff. Start with the differences below, then test the same essential workflow. We have not used these products hands-on or established an overall winner.

Juste vs Sentrient GRC for NDIS: the published starting point
Buying questionJusteSentrient GRC for NDIS
What does it do?Juste combines an NDIS provider directory with operational tools for agencies and independent workers. Its current offer covers rosters, participant communication, shift notes and invoices.Sentrient offers an NDIS edition of its governance, risk and compliance software. It combines sector training, policy records, incident and risk registers, and audit templates.
Why consider it here?Vendor explicitly markets the product as an NDIS directory and operations platform.NDIS-focused GRC and workforce learning platform; provider responsibility and regulatory reporting remain separate.
What is the cost basis?Published Solo A$29/month, Small A$199/month for up to 20 workers, Mid A$699/month for up to 100 workers; confirm GST and annual terms.Current price not verified; request a written quote.
What should the demo show?Accept a fictional directory enquiry, assign a worker, record both sides of a shift and produce a plan-managed invoice.Assign induction training to a fictional worker, record a policy acknowledgement and assemble an incident audit trail.

Compare the evidence, product by product

Juste — published capabilities

  • Provider directory and participant enquiries
  • Worker and participant rosters
  • Two-sided shift notes and messaging
  • NDIS invoice and PRODA-ready export

Source check: 2026-09-24. Published vendor statements, not independent feature testing.

Questions for Juste

  • Is the directory listing required to use the operations tools?
  • How are participant and worker note disagreements preserved?
  • Does the PRODA-ready export cover our claiming path?
Read the full Juste profile ↗

Sentrient GRC for NDIS — published capabilities

  • NDIS training courses
  • policy management and sign-off
  • incident and risk registers
  • inspection and audit templates
  • worker screening records

Source check: 2026-09-24. Published vendor statements, not independent feature testing.

Questions for Sentrient GRC for NDIS

  • Which partner training courses are included in the licence?
  • How are NDIS practice-standard changes updated?
  • Can worker-screening gaps block roster assignments through an integration?
Read the full Sentrient GRC for NDIS profile ↗

Run the same scenario in both

Build a fictional weekend roster with a shift change and travel. Approve the actual hours and reconcile the payroll export with the roster.

  • Match worker availability and required credentials to the proposed shift.
  • Change a shift and confirm who receives the update and acknowledges it.
  • Inspect the treatment of actual times, breaks, allowances and travel.
  • Validate payroll outputs with your payroll specialist; retain the approval history.

Put the quotes on the same basis

Compare active employee definitions, payroll modules, minimum seats, integration fees, onboarding and support.

Use the same volumes, currency, GST basis and billing period for both quotes. Include migration, staff training time, required companion subscriptions and the cost of retrieving records at exit. If a charge is unverified, keep it as an open question rather than treating it as free.

How to reach a decision

  1. Choose the tasks your service cannot operate without before either demonstration.
  2. Record demonstrated, partial, not demonstrated or not applicable for each task. Keep the evidence and edition name.
  3. Ask the vendor to resolve every failed essential task in writing; a high average score cannot erase it.
  4. Test a correction, permission change and export. These are part of everyday operations, not just implementation.
  5. Decide using workflow fit, full cost and your team’s capacity to change systems. Retain the written assumptions for review.

What this comparison does not establish

Workforce software is a supporting system. A claimed award feature is not a guarantee of correct payroll for your employment arrangements. A capability not mentioned in the reviewed source remains unverified, not absent. This comparison does not certify compliance, integrations, accessibility, security or migration outcomes.